No UN Footprints in Davos-on-Hudson
|
02/20/2002
Those hoping that media-savvy Kofi Annan will help the UN overtake
Davos in international clout were disappointed to discover that
Davos almost took over the UN.
The first economic forum to take place in New York was just four
blocks away, at the Waldorf-Astoria, but the gathering made the
UN appear almost irrelevant, earning not a word in the mainstream
press until the Secretary General, who was rightly engaged elsewhere,
delivered closing remarks. To use a new idiom, there were no footprints
from anyone in the world's all-inclusive organization.
None of the senior officials participating bothered to make the
short hop to pay the UN a courtesy call. The chief New York Times
correspondent, Serge Schmemann, possibly finding little in the
building, moved to cover the forum. Only Afghan leader Hamid Karzai
made the inevitable call on the Security Council, but with no
prominent secretariat official to highlight the truly excellent
work of their Afghan colleagues. In return for this effort, Mr.
Karzai, who was a special guest of the joint House meeting in
Washington, was informed in somewhat pompous terms by Singapore's
ambassador that his requests could not be accommodated.
Incidentally, to Mr. Karzai's credit he was the only senior statesman
visiting New York at the time who bypassed the Waldorf gathering,
going straight to Kabul and leaving his foreign minister to take
the front seat. Although all the issues were part of the UN activities
and an integral component in the millennium plan-of-action, participants'
talk focused on non-UN speakers, giving the perception of irrelevance
to the UN. There were, to be sure, some UN officials, but they
seemed preoccupied with their titles and the fumbling exchange
of business cards in an awkward attempt at "networking" with business
sharpshooters who themselves invented the art of the deal.
It was embarrassing to see those who turn a haughty shoulder
to their staff suddenly fawn over businessmen half their age,
businessmen who would respect them far more if they knew how to
present the issues and represent their organization. The final
appearance of the Secretary General helped surmount this sense
of growing irrelevance. But how long can such characters take
refuge under the protective umbrella of Kofi Annan?
|